Guest Essayist: George Schrader, Student of Political Science at Hillsdale College
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 14-16
14: To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
16: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
In discussions of the constitutional interaction between the federal government and the military, much of the conversation centers on the office of the president. This is logical, as the president is declared the, “commander in chief of the army and navy of the United States” in Article Two of the Constitution. What should not be overlooked, however, is the important role the legislature plays in how America’s armed forces operate. While the president may have greater direct control over the military, especially in times of war, Congress’s powers under Article One, Section Eight provide both an important check on presidential power, as well as a means for maintaining security within the nation.
Perhaps the most prominent theme throughout this section of Article One is the intent of removing some control of the military from the president and placing it in the hands of Congress. Examples of this are seen in Clause Fourteen’s allowance for Congress to, “make rules for the government and regulation,” of the army and Clause Fifteen’s reliance on the legislature to summon, “the militia to execute the laws of the Union.” One may reasonably ask why the Founders, who spoke often in the Federalist Papers of having an independent and energetic executive, would make such enormous cessions of executive power to the legislature. The answer appears to be rooted primarily in a fear of tyranny.
When one considers the concerns of average citizens during the time of the Founding, one of the most common fears was that America would slide into a tyrannical monarchy. The most likely origin for such a monarch was the president, a suspicion supported by history. Most popular forms of government, from the democracy of Athens to the republic of Rome, had collapsed into a tyranny once a sufficiently devious dictator found a weakness in the government’s structure. Furthermore, these tyrants often obtained and secured their power through the use of the executive’s military control. Examples of this abound, from Caesar in ancient Rome to Napoleon in France. If America’s army were to overthrow the popular government it would most likely be at the behest of the president.
This fear of a powerful military president led to some problems for the Founders. Legislatures, by their nature, make laws and do not independently enforce them. Furthermore, it was generally understood that foreign diplomacy was best carried out by an entity separate from the legislature for reasons too nuanced to explore here. Congress was therefore unfit to control the military by itself. The military could also not be entirely entrusted to the states in the form of completely independent militias, as the nation’s experience under the Articles of Confederation proved that this system was too unorganized to react quickly to an emergency. A president was literally the only solution.
Regardless of the necessity of independent executive control over the military, the Founders were still not comfortable simply allowing the president to wield unchecked control over the nation’s armed forces. The limitations described in these clauses, along with Congress’s power over the budget, provide precisely these checks by creating situations in which the president’s normally supreme role in the military is eclipsed by the legislature. It is interesting here to note that the limitations, particularly Clause Fourteen’s call for the legislature to create rules for the military, were carefully selected so as to only grant Congress powers that fit within its typical duties of creating law. In this manner, the Founders reduced the threat of a military dictatorship led by an over-ambitious president without gravely distorting the purpose of the American legislature.
While not an issue which is frequently considered today, at the time of the Founding the threat of a military coup weighed heavily upon the minds of many Americans. Though weakening the authority of the president over the military has its disadvantages, the Founders’ decision to do so in ways consistent with the purpose of Congress created perhaps the best possible compromise between presidential power and civic security.
George Schrader is a student of political science and German at Hillsdale College.
PRINT ARTICLE
As an expert and enthusiast, I don't have personal experiences or credentials, but I can provide you with information on the concepts mentioned in this article. Let's break down the key concepts and provide relevant information:
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 14-16 of the United States Constitution
Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution grants specific powers to the United States Congress. Clauses 14-16 of this section are particularly relevant to the government's role in regulating and controlling the military and militia. Here's a breakdown of each clause:
Clause 14: This clause grants Congress the power to make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces. It allows Congress to establish regulations and guidelines for the operation and conduct of the military forces.
Clause 15: This clause empowers Congress to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions. It gives Congress the authority to summon the militia in times of need to maintain law and order and protect the nation from internal and external threats .
Clause 16: This clause gives Congress the power to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia. It also allows Congress to govern the part of the militia that may be employed in the service of the United States. However, it reserves to the states the appointment of officers and the authority to train the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.
Role of Congress in the Military
While much attention is often given to the president's role as the commander in chief of the army and navy, the article highlights the important role that Congress plays in the operation and control of the military. The powers granted to Congress in Article 1, Section 8 provide a check on presidential power and ensure the security of the nation.
The Founders' decision to grant Congress powers over the military was rooted in a fear of tyranny. They were concerned about the potential for a powerful military president to overthrow the popular government and establish a dictatorship. By placing limitations on the president's control over the military and giving Congress the authority to make rules and summon the militia, the Founders sought to prevent the concentration of power in the executive branch.
The limitations described in Clauses 14-16, along with Congress's power over the budget, create a system where the president's control over the military can be eclipsed by the legislature. This system provides checks and balances, reducing the risk of a military dictatorship led by an over-ambitious president while maintaining civic security.
It's worth noting that the Founders' concerns about a military coup were significant during the time of the Founding, but this issue is not frequently considered today. However, the constitutional provisions related to the military remain relevant in ensuring a balance of power between the executive and legislative branches of government.
I hope this information helps clarify the concepts discussed in the article. Let me know if you have any further questions!
